Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update module github.com/emiago/sipgo to v0.19.0 #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
github.com/emiago/sipgo v0.17.0 -> v0.19.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

emiago/sipgo (github.com/emiago/sipgo)

v0.19.0

Compare Source

HAS BREAKING CHANGES

  • NewRequest now accept recipient as value instead pointer to prevent nil pointer issue with no performance drop

Other:

  • client.DoDigestAuth exposes digest auth for client
  • uri.Endpoint adds URI endpoint style formating
  • lot of refactoring and cleanups

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: emiago/sipgo@v0.18.0...v0.19.0

v0.18.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

  • fix: use record route header in bye by @​AnshulMalik in https://github.com/emiago/sipgo/pull/72
  • UDP connection handling improved + cleanup for udp listener connection is now fixed.
  • Some previous also fixes increased overall performance of library but also we may also improve transaction layer to remove some dummy concurency

Full Changelog: emiago/sipgo@v0.17.1...v0.18.0

v0.17.1

Compare Source

Full Changelog: emiago/sipgo@v0.17.0...v0.17.1

  • This release increases performance by moving concurrency on transaction layer after msg are parsed
  • Benchmarking is now parallel to simulate more clients
  • many other fixes...

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-emiago-sipgo-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 7bd9cff to 4f8c4ca Compare March 18, 2024 01:17
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update module github.com/emiago/sipgo to v0.18.0 Update module github.com/emiago/sipgo to v0.19.0 Mar 18, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-emiago-sipgo-0.x branch from 4f8c4ca to f19e04f Compare March 27, 2024 21:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (314d01e) to head (31c7f07).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #166   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files          27      27           
  Lines        2173    2173           
======================================
  Misses       2173    2173           
Flag Coverage Δ
go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
wasm 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-emiago-sipgo-0.x branch 6 times, most recently from fce4f04 to 5732d96 Compare March 28, 2024 13:28
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-emiago-sipgo-0.x branch from 5732d96 to 31c7f07 Compare March 28, 2024 17:00
@renovate renovate bot merged commit d7bfc61 into master Mar 28, 2024
14 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/github.com-emiago-sipgo-0.x branch March 28, 2024 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants